Monday, September 6, 2010

Autumn colors 2010

Labor day 2010 felt like the perfect day to discuss Autumn fashion and what is currently showing up in the stores . A recent article in the LA Times stated longer skirts were the trend for Fall a sure sign of a slow economy. On a foray through the stores I found saturated colors filling the racks a pleasant surprise. This is similar to what was shown at the the Spring Mercedes Benz Fashion Week for Autumn 2010 . On that runway an explosion of looks short and long skirts as well as uneven hemlines were the highlights. (Reference my Mercedes Benz blogs 4/12 ; 4/13 ; 4/14 ; & 4/20 ) This was a reflection of an unsure but optimistic look at the future and economy. It was a nice change from the somber dark colors and long skirts which were shown on the European runways.
Unfortunately the world economy is still in an upheaval, and economists predict yet a possible second economic slump. With money tight, and Americans saving more than they are spending, fashion trends will continue to remain flat as I predicted in my May blog on economics. Refashioning old pieces from the closet will have to satisfy the fashionistas on a tight budget. Rit dye, did you hear that ? Perhaps bathtub dying will make a comeback.
Americans are generally an optimistic group, so I believe the strong saturated colors will be popular. The intensity is still dark and respectful of the fragile economy , but the color is fresh and not as depressing as the overall use of black and brown that the Europeans used on their runway.



Friday, June 11, 2010

Rethink, Restore, and Restyle, the Wedding Dress Tradition




 When Chelsea Clinton marries Marc Mezvinsky she  won't be wearing her mother's wedding dress, (circa 1975) for her nuptials, however that's of no surprise. Women rarely wear their mother's wedding dress anymore. However the bygone tradition of saving a wedding dress and handing it down to the next generation is still a wonderful idea. That's where restyling comes into play.
In this era of reduce and reuse perhaps it's time to rethink this lost tradition. Below I have included a photo timeline of wedding dresses dating back to 1900.

(Wedding dresses from '60's, 70's and '80's )

With so many wedding dresses boxed, preserved and in limbo, what happens as styles change, daughters are two or three sizes larger than their mother, or the children turn out to be boys not girls? There is also a negative aspect to wearing the same dress mom did if she is divorced from dad. Restyling a dress can be a wonderful way of preserving the sentimental aspect of mom's dress and also rescuing the dress from a lifetime of deep storage. Diamond rings are restyled all the time, why not the wedding dress?


(30's, 40's, 50's )

The current style for wedding dresses is the strapless gown. Some dresses can easily be cut to create this look. For other gowns, removing the sleeves or changing the neckline can dramatically update the look. In the case of a less formal wedding, the dress can be shortened to the knee. The remaining fabric should be enough to create a flower girl's dress. For those who want a complete change in the look, removing the lace and using it on a newly designed dress is another way to retain the heirloom sentiment.


(1900-'20's )

I have used all the above techniques at one time or another and even dyed wedding dresses from thrift shops to create completely new looks. Fun, creative and smart.







Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Weddings Yesterday and Today



June has arrived, and thousands of brides are preparing for their big day. Weddings are often associated with tension and stress. With today's blog, I want to look at the way our ancestors celebrated matrimony. In those bygone eras, marriages, good or bad did last till "death do you part". Now five years of marriage is considered a milestone.

At a relative's home recently, I was looking at the photo of my great, great, grandmother's wedding day, which reminded me how much the social event has changed. In times past, there was a more practical view of the wedding, unless of course you were from royalty or a very wealthy family. Queen Victoria made a statement by wearing a white wedding dress for her nuptials to Albert in 1840. (Far left photo above) This was at a time when many woman wore their best dress in the closet and the whole ceremony was a solemn event. Victoria's dress began a fashion of the white dress symbolizing purity and virginity. Today very few brides make it the alter in that condition. Before the 20th century, the idea of wearing a dress just once was a ridicules notion. Perhaps our ancestors were on to something. During WWII many weddings were rushed, as thousand soldiers were shipped off to war. Brides often wore a simple suit. (Middle photo above)

My great, great grandmother was six feet tall and she made her wedding dress . The sepia tone photo only reveals the dress was not white. From what I have been told the color was blue, assuming our family folklore is correct. I don't have the exact date of the wedding but, the style of her bustle wedding dress suggests, it was post Civil War, early 1870. Clearly Queen Victoria's white wedding dress trend had yet to take hold here in the U.S. some thirty years later. In the 1920's young women celebrated their freedom by wearing short dresses. (Far right photo above) The 1950's was a turning point in the direction of wedding dresses. During this era, a dress dedicated solely to the occasion became the norm .



For the modern wedding now, spending $15,000 or more on a wedding dress is not uncommon. But for those who would rather invest their money toward a home or perhaps a lavish honeymoon, on the other end of the spectrum, there are stores such as JCrew which offer beautiful and sophisticated silk wedding dresses starting at around $ 300 . (See two left photos above)

Wedding veils for those who want one, are another costly addition to the wedding ensemble. E-how ( www.ehow.com/video_4755041_make-own-wedding-veil.html ) has a video on making your own. But if I were a bride now I would consider finding a beautiful necklace that could be worn as a head piece and nix the veil. Later the necklace can be worn for other occasions.

Necklaces for the hair - www.tigerlillyjewelry.com
Wedding customs 1850-1950- www.squidoo.com/weddingtraditions
History of the white wedding dress- www.fromtimespast.com/wedding.htm
Native American Algonquin wedding www.manataka.org/page348.html

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

Sheer Mistakes On The Celebrity Red Carpet

(Click Photo To Enlarge)

In my blog: Valentino -Hope Springs Eternal 2010, I said "Already I have visions of inebriated celebrities fueling TMZ or the cover of Enquirer by letting it all hang out."

Clearly Liza Minelli (on the left) needs help on how to wear sheers . Wearing the silicone stick-on bra under sheer fabric does not work-ever . It is not meant to be seen. The ankle boots under the sheer pants look like black socks and make her ankle look heavy. Liza has been in the business too long to make these kinds of mistakes. With modern technology at our finger tips, it's easy to take a quick photo with your camera flash-on and double check how you will look. (When the flash is on, it will reveal sheerness that is not apparent to the naked eye).

Jessica Szohr looked fantastic and wore the sheer look with class. (photo on the right) Perhaps Liza could lessons from Jessica.

Friday, May 21, 2010

Slava Zaitsev Fall/Winter 2010 Turbans and Tweeds

(Click on photo to enlarge)

Slava Zaitsev obviously has a flare for drama. From what I can see, his 2010 collection for men and women has elements of Lawrence of Arabia, Turkish Whirling Dervish, Dior's New Look 1948, 1950's chunky tweeds and large buttons, and dramatic 1930's turban hats. (see bottom row middle to right five photos)

With the men's line, although mostly monochromatic in tone, the layers were well put together, and very appealing . Slava's women's line, the loose fitting chunky tweeds, add weight onto the body frame. I would prefer to see them used in more flattering and fitted silhouettes. But I live in weight obsessed, sunny California not Russia.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Yegor Zaitsev Moscow RFW 2010

(Click on Photo to enlarge)
Today a look at Yegor Zaitsev's collection from Russian Fashion Week 2010 in Moscow. His collection was completely wild and surreal. However I would say the outfits have limited use in everyday life. Looking at his runway show was like watching a Tim Burton movie. I thought about all the places it would be wrong to wear these outfits : work, post office,  bank, dinner, marketing, gardening. This leaves trolling the club scene and rudely taking up the whole dance floor. Perhaps the best use would be a Halloween costume. Your closet might need enlarging for one of the designs. Be careful of the sharp points assaulting you. A person might be surprised enough to cut up the outfit in self defense.

Wednesday, May 19, 2010

Moscow Runway 2010 Ivan Ipotov Collection

Today I will discuss Ivan Ipotov's collection for both men and women which was presented at the Moscow Fashion Week 2010 . To be fair, my knowledge of Russian history, economics, and imagery has a fairly limited range. I know a bit on the late 19th century to present day-and even then it's not in depth. Without experiencing and living the life, it's hard to grasp the soul and heart beat of the people. So I will comment from a my American point a view.

(Click on photo to enlarge)
There was no apparent Russian historical reference in Ipotov's collection that I could see . His men's line had many interesting ensembles and suits and they are all very wearable. What was very different from the U.S. and European runway were the models. For his men's collection the models were not refined or pretty, but they are good looking and real. (Many photos were cropped at the head by the photographer) In some ways it way great to see what the collection looks like on real people. Overall the stage production and direction lacked excitement, sophistication and elegance.


(Click on photo to enlarge)
The women's collection was very ho hum to me. Perhaps designing women's clothes are not his strong point. The line looked dated and boring. His theme included boxing glove teddy bears carried by the models. These silly props added to the novice look of the show. As for the female models I thought they had far better figures than any European or U.S. models. Their weight was perhaps five to ten pounds more than any model we are familiar with. In my opinion this made the dresses look much better. As with the men's line, it was nice to see what the clothes look like on a real person. The models all had a fresh and natural look, but almost too natural. The lack luster hair and make-up didn't do anything to help sell the outfits.